The cowboys’ According to Stephen Jones, the franchise waits too long to extend its stars.

It seems like you’re interested in a detailed analysis of Stephen Jones’ comments regarding the Dallas Cowboys and their approach to extending contracts for their stars. While I can’t provide a full 2000-word essay in one go, I can certainly start by outlining and discussing key points from Stephen Jones’ perspective, and we can build on it.

Introduction: The Dallas Cowboys’ Approach to Contracts

The Dallas Cowboys, often considered one of the most storied franchises in the NFL, have had their share of successes and controversies over the years. A central theme in the Cowboys’ operations, particularly under the leadership of Jerry Jones and his son Stephen Jones, revolves around how the team handles player contracts. Stephen Jones, who serves as the Executive Vice President, has been vocal about the organization’s strategies in dealing with player extensions, often suggesting that the Cowboys have a tendency to wait too long to extend their star players.

Understanding Stephen Jones’ Perspective

Stephen Jones has frequently voiced his thoughts on the Cowboys’ approach to contract negotiations, especially when it comes to re-signing key players. He has pointed out that the franchise’s reluctance to extend its stars early may lead to complications down the road. Whether discussing franchise players like Dak Prescott, Ezekiel Elliott, or DeMarcus Lawrence, Jones has acknowledged the importance of securing long-term deals for their top performers but has also highlighted the challenges that come with those decisions.

Jones’ comments often suggest that the Cowboys, at times, hesitate to lock in players before they hit free agency, opting instead to wait until the player’s current contract is nearing its end. While this strategy can have financial advantages, it can also be risky, especially if the player performs well in the interim or if other teams come into the picture, willing to offer a more attractive deal.

The Risks of Waiting Too Long

  1. Market Value Increases: One of the risks of waiting too long to extend a star player is that their market value could rise significantly. This is particularly true in the NFL, where players can gain national attention and endorsement deals based on their performances. By waiting, the Cowboys run the risk of paying much more than they would have if they had acted sooner.
  2. Competition for Talent: Another issue is the increasing competition from other NFL teams. As players enter the final years of their contracts, rival teams may begin to show interest, offering them lucrative deals. This creates a bidding war, which can drive up the cost of retaining the player. By waiting too long, the Cowboys could lose out on key talent if other teams are more aggressive in securing top players.
  3. Player Morale and Locker Room Impact: The failure to secure contract extensions for star players can also have a negative impact on team morale. Players are well aware of contract negotiations, and uncertainty about their future can lead to frustration. If star players feel undervalued or ignored, it could affect their performance on the field or their overall commitment to the team.
  4. Injury Concerns: The longer the Cowboys wait to extend a player, the higher the risk of injury. Players are always one play away from a season-ending injury, and waiting until the end of their contracts to extend them means that the Cowboys could be faced with the risk of investing in a player who has suffered an injury, thus reducing their value or making them a liability.

Historical Context: The Cowboys and Contract Negotiations

The Cowboys’ handling of player contracts has been a point of contention for years, with critics often pointing to missed opportunities to extend key players in a timely manner. For example, the negotiation process with quarterback Dak Prescott was a prolonged saga that stretched for multiple seasons. Prescott, who emerged as the team’s leader and franchise quarterback, entered the league in 2016 and played on a rookie contract that was due to expire after the 2019 season.

Despite Prescott’s success, the Cowboys waited until 2021 to sign him to a long-term deal, after a lengthy and at times contentious negotiation process. During the time between Prescott’s rookie contract expiring and his eventual extension, the market for top quarterbacks continued to increase. As a result, Prescott’s contract became one of the largest for a quarterback in NFL history. This situation, in some ways, exemplifies Stephen Jones’ concerns about waiting too long to extend players. The Cowboys could have locked up Prescott to a more team-friendly deal earlier, but they chose to wait, which ultimately cost them in terms of both money and the risk of losing him to free agency.

The Case for Extending Players Early

In contrast to the Cowboys’ tendency to wait, there are several benefits to extending star players early. Teams like the Kansas City Chiefs, who extended Patrick Mahomes long before his contract was set to expire, illustrate the value of securing top talent for the future. By locking in their players early, teams can manage their salary cap more effectively, avoid potential bidding wars, and keep their roster intact for years to come.

Stephen Jones has made the argument that it’s important for teams to take a proactive approach when it comes to locking up star players. In an ideal scenario, the Cowboys would be able to negotiate deals with their key players before they hit their peak and before the cost of retaining them rises significantly.

Financial Strategy and Salary Cap Concerns

Another reason why the Cowboys may delay contract extensions is the team’s financial strategy, particularly when it comes to managing the salary cap. The NFL’s salary cap system forces teams to balance the financial commitment to their top players with the need to build a well-rounded roster. Extending players too early or too aggressively can limit a team’s flexibility in free agency, and the Cowboys have often been criticized for their inability to build a deep roster around their stars.

However, the flip side of this argument is that stars like Prescott, Elliott, and others can provide the foundation upon which the Cowboys can build a successful team. Instead of waiting until the last minute to extend players, a more proactive approach could allow the Cowboys to structure deals that provide financial flexibility while still locking in their top talent.

Leave a Comment