-
For more than six decades, the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders have been among the most recognizable symbols of American sports entertainment, known for their precision choreography, glamour, and unwavering presence on the sidelines of “America’s Team.” They have graced magazine covers, made television appearances, and become cultural icons in their own right. Yet, behind the sequins and the smiles was a harsher reality—these women, lauded as elite performers and held to the highest standards of discipline and athleticism, were grossly underpaid. It wasn’t until the 2024 season that the Dallas Cowboys organization finally committed to paying their cheerleaders a living wage. The question looms: why did it take 65 seasons?
To understand how we arrived at this overdue milestone, one must trace the history of cheerleading itself. The Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders (DCC) were formed in 1961, but it wasn’t until 1972 that they transformed into the modern dance team format that captivated the country. With glamour, style, and fierce athleticism, the DCC reinvented the perception of cheerleaders in the NFL. They weren’t just sideline supporters—they became the main attraction. Yet while the brand of the DCC soared in popularity and commercial value, the financial treatment of the women behind it remained stuck in the shadows of outdated norms.
Historically, NFL cheerleaders have been paid significantly below minimum wage, often receiving between $100 and $150 per game and little or no compensation for mandatory rehearsals, community appearances, and travel. Many were expected to buy their own makeup, manage strict physical requirements, and train extensively—all while holding full-time jobs or being full-time students. The prestige of being a DCC member was often pitched as payment in itself, a harmful mindset that pervaded the entertainment and sports industries for generations. But as cultural norms evolved and labor rights awareness expanded, the contradiction between the cheerleaders’ fame and their compensation became impossible to ignore.
Part of the problem was the perception of cheerleading as ancillary to the “real” product: football. Cheerleaders were seen by many owners and fans as decorative or ceremonial, not essential. But the truth was—and remains—that these women are high-performance artists, brand ambassadors, and significant revenue drivers. The DCC in particular have been a merchandising powerhouse, starring in reality shows, calendars, commercials, and USO tours that boost both team visibility and revenue. Yet despite their economic contributions, their compensation remained shockingly stagnant.
